Snapshot Verdict
myInterview is a video-first recruitment platform designed to automate the initial screening phase of hiring. By replacing the traditional telephone screen with asynchronous video interviews, it promises to save recruiters dozens of hours per week. While the automation is efficient and the AI-driven personality insights are intriguing, the platform risks making the hiring process feel transactional and impersonal if not managed carefully. It is best suited for high-volume hiring environments where speed is prioritized over deep initial human connection.
Product Version
Version reviewed: Web-based platform current as of late 2023 / early 2024.
What This Product Actually Is
At its core, myInterview is an asynchronous video interviewing tool. Instead of scheduling a live Zoom call or a phone interview, a recruiter sends a link to a candidate. The candidate then records their answers to a series of pre-set questions using their webcam or smartphone.
The platform sits between the initial application (the resume) and the final "live" interview. It includes a suite of management tools that allow hiring teams to collaborate, rate candidates, and share recordings. It also features an integrated AI layer—often referred to as myInterview Intelligence—which analyzes the candidate's speech and behavior to provide a personality profile based on the Big Five personality traits.
The software is designed to integrate directly into existing Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), acting as a functional extension of the recruiter’s dashboard rather than a standalone silo. For the candidate, there is no software to download; the experience lives entirely within a mobile-optimized browser.
Real-World Use & Experience
Setting up a job on myInterview is straightforward. A recruiter defines the role, selects or writes a few key questions, and determines the constraints—such as how much time the candidate has to think before the recording starts and whether they are allowed multiple takes.
The candidate experience is the most critical part of the funnel. From our observation, the mobile interface is slick. Most candidates can complete a three-question interview in under ten minutes. However, the "one-way" nature of the interaction can be jarring. Without a human on the other side to give visual cues or follow-up questions, candidates often appear more nervous or stiff than they would in a natural conversation.
For the recruiter, the "Review" dashboard is the main workspace. You can watch videos at 1.5x speed, which is a significant time-saver. The ability to leave time-stamped comments for colleagues makes the collaborative side of hiring much more efficient than passing around printed resumes or disjointed email threads.
The AI personality analysis is presented alongside the video. It offers a breakdown of traits like openness, conscientiousness, and extroversion. While these metrics provide a data point for comparison, they should be viewed as supplementary rather than definitive. Relying too heavily on these scores without watching the video can lead to missing out on talented but introverted candidates.
Standout Strengths
- Fast mobile-friendly candidate experience.
- Automated interview scheduling reduction.
- Seamless ATS integration capabilities.
The speed at which a recruiter can move through a list of twenty applicants is the primary reason to use this tool. In the time it takes to do one thirty-minute phone screen, a recruiter can review ten video submissions. This is a game-changer for high-volume roles like retail, hospitality, or customer service.
The collaboration tools are also remarkably well-thought-out. By allowing multiple stakeholders to view the same candidate recording and provide structured feedback, the platform reduces the "telephone game" that often happens when a recruiter tries to describe a candidate to a hiring manager.
Finally, the lack of an app download for the candidate is a major friction reducer. In modern recruitment, any barrier to entry—like forcing a candidate to create an account or download an executable file—leads to high drop-off rates. myInterview avoids this by keeping everything in the browser.
Limitations, Trade-offs & Red Flags
- Significant candidate anxiety potential.
- Impersonal first impression of company.
- AI traits lack deep context.
The most significant trade-off is the "human factor." Many high-quality candidates dislike asynchronous interviews, finding them cold and robotic. If you are hiring for a high-level executive role or a niche creative position, using a tool like myInterview might signal to the candidate that your company values efficiency over people.
There is also the risk of bias. While the platform claims to help reduce bias by standardizing questions, the visual nature of video interviewing brings unconscious bias to the forefront. Seeing a candidate's home background, their clothing, or their physical appearance before meeting them can influence a recruiter's decision-making in ways that a blind resume check or a phone call might not.
The AI intelligence feature, while helpful for spotting outliers, can be misleading. A candidate who is extremely nervous might be flagged as having low "emotional stability" when, in reality, they are simply uncomfortable talking to a camera lens. Users should be wary of using the AI scores as a primary filter.
Who It's Actually For
myInterview is purpose-built for recruiters and HR managers who handle high-volume hiring. If you are a hospitality group looking for 50 seasonal workers, or a call center with a constant churn of entry-level staff, this tool will save you hundreds of hours of repetitive phone screening.
It is also a strong fit for recruitment agencies who need to "sell" their candidates to clients. Sending a link to a curated video interview is far more persuasive than just sending a PDF resume. It gives the client a sense of the candidate's communication skills and personality instantly.
It is not a good fit for small businesses hiring one or two people a year, nor is it recommended for highly specialized technical roles where a two-way dialogue is necessary to probe the depth of a candidate's expertise.
Value for Money & Alternatives
The value proposition depends entirely on your hiring volume. myInterview typically offers tiered pricing, often starting with a free version for a limited number of seats or active jobs, moving up to enterprise-level subscriptions. For a mid-sized company hiring 20-30 people a year, the cost of the subscription is easily offset by the time saved in the initial screening phase.
Value for money: fair
Alternatives
- HireVue — A more expensive, enterprise-heavy competitor with deeper AI and assessment features.
- Spark Hire — A very similar video interviewing platform with a focus on simplicity and robust customer support.
- Loom — A generic video messaging tool that can be used as a "hack" for video interviews, though it lacks specialized recruitment tracking.
Final Verdict
myInterview is a powerful efficiency tool that solves the specific problem of "screening fatigue." It works exactly as advertised: it lets you see and hear your candidates before you ever pick up the phone. As long as you treat the AI insights as a secondary data point and remain mindful of the candidate's potential discomfort with the format, it is a robust addition to a modern recruitment stack. It isn't a replacement for the human interview, but it is an excellent way to make sure you're spending that human time with the right people.
Want a review of another tool? Generate one now.